рефераты конспекты курсовые дипломные лекции шпоры

Реферат Курсовая Конспект

General remarks.

General remarks. - раздел Философия, Lectures in Theory of ENGLISH Grammar Traditionally Units Larger Than A Sentence Are Considered To Be Properties Of...

Traditionally units larger than a sentence are considered to be properties of Speech but not Language. The reason is that a unit of language must be a recurrent, that is repeated element. In this respect we should ask ourselves whatis to be repeated so that we can recognise an element as a unit. An answer to this question depends upon image of language we have.

For long relations between units of different levels were compared to those existing in a building: the smaller units were compared to bricks, the larger units —to blocks of bricks and the whole building — to a sentence. But every is useful only as an initial approach and becomes false if we insist not only on similarity of relations, but on more or less full coincidence of features. This is true for the comparison of a linguistic structure with buildings or any other physically existing structures. Thus to define a unit we have to discover what is actually repeated in speech.

For that we should find what are the elements of the units composed of. If we take any unit: a phoneme, a morpheme or any other, we can see that a unit is, in fact, a set of components with relations among them. So we can conclude that a unit has a structure and components. If so, we can state that recurrence or repetition may concern three features:

a) a unit is a repetition of components only;

b) a unit is a repetition of both components and structure;

c) a unit is a repetition of structure only.

These three possible answers should be now tested. If we take that a unit is a repetition of components only, we can find a great number of units having the same components but different structures, for example such morphs as |let| and |tell|. Thus the first answer cannot be accepted.

If we take that a unit is a repetition of both components and structure, then we should consider that the only units of language are allophones and perhaps morphs. But even these are not repeated in absolutely identical components. Moreover, we should forget about abstract units, since even for phonemes components are variable, including sometimes their relevant features. But the concrete, etic units might be considered as features of the language only if their connected with appropriate abstract, emic units.

Thus we have to take only the third answer stating that a unit is a repetition of structure. If so, we have to consider any repetition of relations of smaller units as a unit of language even if the components of the structure are used in these relations for the first time. From this follows that a sentence, being a stable and repeated structure, is a unit, though in the majority of occasions the very components, that is words within a sentence, might be found in this structure only once.

If we can prove that combinations of sentences are repeated structures in specific functions, we can say that there are units larger than a sentence. In §14 Ch1 we suggested that the units larger than a sentence might be of three types: dialogues, communicative parts and utterances. Now we have to prove that they have repeated structures. To prove that we take a short dialogue and try to find what can be changed in it without destroying it, for example lets take a dialogue the aim of which is to find out time:

A. Excuse me …

B. Yes?

A. Can you tell me what is the time now?

B. Half past two.

A. Thank you.

Not at all.

We can change a lot of things in this short dialogue. We can substitute all words in the utterances but the first two and the last but one. But we cannot remove the one of the utterances. If we do so, either the dialogue will be destroyed or it will belong to some other sphere of communication. Most interesting might be the result of deletion of the final utterance (not at all). Its exclusion will not actually destroy the dialogue or move it to some other sphere, it will show that participant B does not behave as expected, that is this participant does not completely perform his/her communicative part.

This analysis allows us to take dialogues and communicative parts as units of language because as we saw they have their specific recurrent structures.

The same is true for the utterance because depending upon the circumstances of speaking utterances have their specific structures and functions, for example an utterance which we may call a question may have different structures depending upon the speaker’s image of the partner and the situation of communication. A question may include some explanation for the very fact of asking the question, for example:

“Oh, my watch has stopped. Jane, don’t you know what’s the time?”

These structures are repeated if other features of communicative situation are repeated. In the dialogue we analysed it is hardly possible to expect that participant A will explain the reason for his/her asking the question.

Concluding this section we may say that Language possesses at least three units larger than a sentence. Since these units may express some of the meanings through opposition of their forms we may find Grammar on these levels too.

– Конец работы –

Эта тема принадлежит разделу:

Lectures in Theory of ENGLISH Grammar

Lectures in Theory of ENGLISH Grammar... PART Chapter General Notions of Grammar...

Если Вам нужно дополнительный материал на эту тему, или Вы не нашли то, что искали, рекомендуем воспользоваться поиском по нашей базе работ: General remarks.

Что будем делать с полученным материалом:

Если этот материал оказался полезным ля Вас, Вы можете сохранить его на свою страничку в социальных сетях:

Все темы данного раздела:

GRAMMAR IN LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR IN KNOWLEDGE
When asked what is Grammar, people usually say that it is a set of rules for correct use of words and making sentences. This definition may be accepted if we mean that Grammar is presentation of ou

GRAMMAR AS KNOWLEDGE OF LANGUAGE
In the previous section we found that Grammar as a part of Language is a system presenting meaning through oppositions of variant of units. In this section we shall try to define Grammar as a scien

VARIANTS OF GRAMMARS
Grammatical studies are usually done with a certain aim in mind, and grammatical descriptions vary with them. There are two main purposes people describe the Grammar of a language. One typ

TYPES OF GRAMMATICAL ANALYSIS
As it was shown in §1, grammatical features are results of formal and meaningful oppositions of variants of units. But in actual speech we hear (or see) only one of the variants. It means that we h

DISTRIBUTIONAL GRAMMAR. SEGMENTATION PROCEDURES
In §4 we defined distributional Grammar as such description of a grammatical system which starts at the positional (syntagmatic) properties of units. In this section we shall discuss the procedures

DISTRIBUTIONAL GRAMMAR. BASIC NOTIONS.
What has been described is only prerequisite of the analysis. The analysis proper of three steps: a) identifying environments; b) arranging distribution; c) comparing dis

DISTRIBUTIONAL GRAMMAR. IMMEDIATE CONSTITUENTS
Distributional analysis does not usually stop here, but endeavours to discover relations of units within the frame of the larger ones. The methods used at this step is known as IMMEDIATE

He sat looking at the silent telephone.
A)The splitting procedure The first division should be placed after He. So we receive two constituents of the first level: He and

TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR. BASIC NOTIONS.
In §7 we found that analytical methods and procedures depend upon the idea of Language. One of the most popular images of Language is presenting it as a mechanism for creating, producing linguistic

TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR. ANALYTIC PROCEDURES
The aim of the transformational analysis is to discover how the sentence under analysis is generated. To achieve this objective we have to find the kernel structures which are the part of the deep

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. GRAMMATICAL MEANING
In §1 we found that that grammar is a system in language which presents meaning through opposition of variants of units. This idea is the basic statement which makes it possible to deduce a great n

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. CATEGORIES.
The notion of grammatical category has a great number of different definitions. And still in all of them the key words are general and obligatory. Keeping that in mind we should develop such defini

STRATIFICATION OF LANGUAGE
As we already know the Grammar of Language embraces all its levels and units. The problem here is: How many and what sorts of units must we recognise to be sure that our model of Language (=theory

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. DIVISION OF GRAMMAR
As we saw in §14 Grammar may be spread to all types of units and units possess quite different functions and other features Grammar as a system of meaningful oppositions should also have properties

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. MORPHOLOGY
As it was shown in§15 Morphology is to be defined in two ways: according to the units described in it and according to properties of the units. You know since your school years that morpho

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. SYNTAX
As it was shown in§15 Syntax is to be defined in two ways: according to the units described in it and according to properties of the units. The units which are explored with the syntactica

MORPHOLOGICAL TYPOLOGY
As it was shown in § 16 Morphology includes several types of units and two types of grammatical meanings which employ the units as their forms. Besides connection with grammatical meanings the unit

SYNTACTICAL TYPOLOGY
Syntax as a part of grammatical description covers not only grammatical features of sentences, but also their referential meaning (semantic syntax). As a result variants of syntactic units which co

UNITS LARGER THAN A SENTENCE
As we saw in §14, grammatical features may be found in the units larger than a sentence, namely, in the utterances, communicative parts and dialogues. But as we have already mentioned above, these

Dialogues
If we take the dialogue of the previous section and change its social setting we would receive quite a different structure. Let us see how the dialogue about finding out time can be formed in case

Communicative part
Communicative parts are seldom recognised as linguistic units. The reason is that dialogues or events of communication are usually divided into steps of communication comprising normally two or mor

Illocution
Illocution is what the speaker wants of his or her partner. It can be shown by the verbs that are caller performative. A performative verb is a verb in the form of the first person Present I

Sentence. Definition.
Before we start discussing grammatical features of sentences we have to define their specific property which differentiates them from other units. In the linguistic theory we can find a great numbe

Structural Types of Sentences.
Structural types of sentences depend upon the way the most important features of the sentence, and namely, predicativity, is reflected in their structure. Since predicativity has three features, th

Communicative types of sentences
The structural types of sentences described in the previous section do not have connections with any special meanings. Yet if we take a sentence and start changing its structure we may observe that

The formal structure of sentences
The formal structure might be presented in several ways. Some of them where described in Chapter One §§ 5-7. A sentence might be presented as a sequence of distributional classes of words. But this

Subject
We defined the subject as such element of a sentence that embodies the personal feature of the predicativity. But this definition does not show formal and semantic (referential) characteristics of

Attribute
Attributes were defined as elements of noun groups. Forms and compositions of adjectives are very variable. The variability of the form of the attribute to a large extent depends on the class of th

Adverbial modifier
The forms and semantic features of adverbial modifies are even more variable than those of attributes. The adverbial modifies might be composed of adverbs, prepositional phrases, verbals and verbal

Phrases and forms of word connections
The IC analysis splits a sentence into phrases that is groups of words connected together. The same groups are found in sentences if we use other types of syntactical analysis. The logical connecti

General remarks
The sentence was defined as a model of some fragment of the world. Besides it is a word or a group of words having predicativity. predicativity was defined as reference of the contents of the utter

Members of the sentence as semantic description of a sentence
The system of members of sentence was initially a syncretic description of form and meaning of elements of a sentence. The meaning of a sentence was identified with a logical union and namely the j

Valence Theory
There were many attempts to overcome inconsistencies of the method of members of sentence. One of the most systematic approaches is known as the valence theory. It is usually considered that the fo

Deep Case Theory
Transformational grammar was the starting point of a rather influentional theory of sentence meaning known as the Deep Case Theory or the Frame Theory. It should be immediately noted that this theo

Compositional Syntax
The concept named "Compositional Syntax" was first formulated and further developed in the Minsk State Linguistic University and more exactly at the department of History and Grammar of E

Хотите получать на электронную почту самые свежие новости?
Education Insider Sample
Подпишитесь на Нашу рассылку
Наша политика приватности обеспечивает 100% безопасность и анонимность Ваших E-Mail
Реклама
Соответствующий теме материал
  • Похожее
  • Популярное
  • Облако тегов
  • Здесь
  • Временно
  • Пусто
Теги