рефераты конспекты курсовые дипломные лекции шпоры

Реферат Курсовая Конспект

Structural Types of Sentences.

Structural Types of Sentences. - раздел Философия, Lectures in Theory of ENGLISH Grammar Structural Types Of Sentences Depend Upon The Way The Most Important Features...

Structural types of sentences depend upon the way the most important features of the sentence, and namely, predicativity, is reflected in their structure. Since predicativity has three features, they might be embodied either together in one component of a sentence, and such sentences are known as one-member sentences. As an example of one-member sentence we can give imperative sentences like Come here! Or Stand up! The other example is a group of nominative sentences, such as A nice winter day. No wind. In other languages the number of structures that are one-member may include also impersonal sentences, but in English impersonal sentences have a structure of the other type, of the type in which the personal element of predicativity is isolated from the other two and embodied in a special element. The other two features of predicativity (temporal and modal) are presented together in another component of the sentence. Such sentences in which the predicativity features are distributed between two elements of a sentence are named two-member sentences: It is cold. John speaks English. A dog runs.

In English and as much as we know in other languages no structure is found in which the three features of predicativity are embodied in three different components of sentences. Thus, we have no three-member sentences.

In case of two-member sentences the elements formalising the features of predicativity are known as the main members. The element which incorporates the personal feature of predicativity is known as the subject of the sentence. The element which incorporates the temporal and modal features of predicativity is known as the predicate of the sentence. Because semantically all three features of predicativity is a unity there exists specific attraction of the subject and the predicate. This attraction is known as predication. We shall discuss different variants of predication at the end of this section.

But a sentence may include either one predicativity centre or several. If a sentence has only one predicativity centre we call such sentences simple. All the sentences we gave as examples above are simple. If a sentence has more than one predicative centre we call it complex. But if we have two or more predicativity centres within one structure, there must be some relations between these elements. We know two types of relations: co-ordination and subordination. Co-ordination means that the predicative centres are not dependant on each other, but all of them depend upon the whole poly-predicative structure which imposes certain logical relationships between them. These logical relations might be conjunctive (or copulative), disjunctive, causative and adversative. Sentences having conjunctive relations between the predicative centres show them as co-existing and united: ***. Disjunctive relations show that only one of the predicative groups is actually true: ***. Causative relations indicate that the first predicative group describes the reason for the other. Adversative relations are used if in spite of the cause formulated by the first predicative group, we observe an unexpected result: ***.

The subordinate relations exist if one predicative group includes one or more other predicative groups as its elements: ***.

The predicative groups within a poly-predicative sentence in English grammar are traditionally called clauses. So the term sentence in English is employed to name a structure comprising one or more predicative groups, i.e. clauses. So, a simple sentence may be called a one-clause sentence.

Clauses usually are described as subject-predicate groups. But this definition is not absolutely correct. It is correct only if the clauses are two-member structures. But not only simple sentences but also clauses of complex sentences can be one-member, and thus, have neither predicate not subject: ***. Besides, the definition of clauses as subject-predicate groups stresses the fact that the clauses should have predication. But predication can have at least two variants. Predication may explicitly show all three features of predicativity and then it is named primary predication. If a group having predication is included into a complex structure, it may share temporal and modal features with the clause it is included in. Then these features may find no formal representation and become implied. Such groups with predication having no formal indication of tense and mood and employing non-finite verbal forms as their predicates are known as secondary predication structures: John saw Jane crossthe street.

The structural types listed above are defined for sentences used in isolation. If a sentence is used in a text it may be given in an abridged variant because the speaker or the writer may omit the elements of a sentence which are quite clear from the context. If the speaker or writer omits one or both main members of the sentence i.e. the subject and the predicate, the resulting structure is an elliptical sentence. One shouldn’t mix up elliptical sentences with one-member sentences. If we have an elliptical sentence we can restore the omitted elements without radical changes in the meaning of the sentence. But this procedure cannot be applied to a one-member sentence. For example, if we find in a text like When are you going to leave? — Tomorrow. A one-word sentence, we can restore it as I leave tomorrow. We have to classify this sentence as an elliptical one. But if try to replenish a sentence like Come here, please! with the indication of the doer of the action as You come here please! we receive either a different type of sentence (a declarative instead of an imperative one) or two one-member sentences you being an application.

But the structure of types of sentences show only one aspect of them. Sentences being elements of speech have their specific communicative functions which are discussed in the following section.

– Конец работы –

Эта тема принадлежит разделу:

Lectures in Theory of ENGLISH Grammar

Lectures in Theory of ENGLISH Grammar... PART Chapter General Notions of Grammar...

Если Вам нужно дополнительный материал на эту тему, или Вы не нашли то, что искали, рекомендуем воспользоваться поиском по нашей базе работ: Structural Types of Sentences.

Что будем делать с полученным материалом:

Если этот материал оказался полезным ля Вас, Вы можете сохранить его на свою страничку в социальных сетях:

Все темы данного раздела:

GRAMMAR IN LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR IN KNOWLEDGE
When asked what is Grammar, people usually say that it is a set of rules for correct use of words and making sentences. This definition may be accepted if we mean that Grammar is presentation of ou

GRAMMAR AS KNOWLEDGE OF LANGUAGE
In the previous section we found that Grammar as a part of Language is a system presenting meaning through oppositions of variant of units. In this section we shall try to define Grammar as a scien

VARIANTS OF GRAMMARS
Grammatical studies are usually done with a certain aim in mind, and grammatical descriptions vary with them. There are two main purposes people describe the Grammar of a language. One typ

TYPES OF GRAMMATICAL ANALYSIS
As it was shown in §1, grammatical features are results of formal and meaningful oppositions of variants of units. But in actual speech we hear (or see) only one of the variants. It means that we h

DISTRIBUTIONAL GRAMMAR. SEGMENTATION PROCEDURES
In §4 we defined distributional Grammar as such description of a grammatical system which starts at the positional (syntagmatic) properties of units. In this section we shall discuss the procedures

DISTRIBUTIONAL GRAMMAR. BASIC NOTIONS.
What has been described is only prerequisite of the analysis. The analysis proper of three steps: a) identifying environments; b) arranging distribution; c) comparing dis

DISTRIBUTIONAL GRAMMAR. IMMEDIATE CONSTITUENTS
Distributional analysis does not usually stop here, but endeavours to discover relations of units within the frame of the larger ones. The methods used at this step is known as IMMEDIATE

He sat looking at the silent telephone.
A)The splitting procedure The first division should be placed after He. So we receive two constituents of the first level: He and

TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR. BASIC NOTIONS.
In §7 we found that analytical methods and procedures depend upon the idea of Language. One of the most popular images of Language is presenting it as a mechanism for creating, producing linguistic

TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR. ANALYTIC PROCEDURES
The aim of the transformational analysis is to discover how the sentence under analysis is generated. To achieve this objective we have to find the kernel structures which are the part of the deep

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. GRAMMATICAL MEANING
In §1 we found that that grammar is a system in language which presents meaning through opposition of variants of units. This idea is the basic statement which makes it possible to deduce a great n

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. CATEGORIES.
The notion of grammatical category has a great number of different definitions. And still in all of them the key words are general and obligatory. Keeping that in mind we should develop such defini

STRATIFICATION OF LANGUAGE
As we already know the Grammar of Language embraces all its levels and units. The problem here is: How many and what sorts of units must we recognise to be sure that our model of Language (=theory

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. DIVISION OF GRAMMAR
As we saw in §14 Grammar may be spread to all types of units and units possess quite different functions and other features Grammar as a system of meaningful oppositions should also have properties

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. MORPHOLOGY
As it was shown in§15 Morphology is to be defined in two ways: according to the units described in it and according to properties of the units. You know since your school years that morpho

CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR. SYNTAX
As it was shown in§15 Syntax is to be defined in two ways: according to the units described in it and according to properties of the units. The units which are explored with the syntactica

MORPHOLOGICAL TYPOLOGY
As it was shown in § 16 Morphology includes several types of units and two types of grammatical meanings which employ the units as their forms. Besides connection with grammatical meanings the unit

SYNTACTICAL TYPOLOGY
Syntax as a part of grammatical description covers not only grammatical features of sentences, but also their referential meaning (semantic syntax). As a result variants of syntactic units which co

UNITS LARGER THAN A SENTENCE
As we saw in §14, grammatical features may be found in the units larger than a sentence, namely, in the utterances, communicative parts and dialogues. But as we have already mentioned above, these

General remarks.
Traditionally units larger than a sentence are considered to be properties of Speech but not Language. The reason is that a unit of language must be a recurrent, that is repeated element. In this r

Dialogues
If we take the dialogue of the previous section and change its social setting we would receive quite a different structure. Let us see how the dialogue about finding out time can be formed in case

Communicative part
Communicative parts are seldom recognised as linguistic units. The reason is that dialogues or events of communication are usually divided into steps of communication comprising normally two or mor

Illocution
Illocution is what the speaker wants of his or her partner. It can be shown by the verbs that are caller performative. A performative verb is a verb in the form of the first person Present I

Sentence. Definition.
Before we start discussing grammatical features of sentences we have to define their specific property which differentiates them from other units. In the linguistic theory we can find a great numbe

Communicative types of sentences
The structural types of sentences described in the previous section do not have connections with any special meanings. Yet if we take a sentence and start changing its structure we may observe that

The formal structure of sentences
The formal structure might be presented in several ways. Some of them where described in Chapter One §§ 5-7. A sentence might be presented as a sequence of distributional classes of words. But this

Subject
We defined the subject as such element of a sentence that embodies the personal feature of the predicativity. But this definition does not show formal and semantic (referential) characteristics of

Attribute
Attributes were defined as elements of noun groups. Forms and compositions of adjectives are very variable. The variability of the form of the attribute to a large extent depends on the class of th

Adverbial modifier
The forms and semantic features of adverbial modifies are even more variable than those of attributes. The adverbial modifies might be composed of adverbs, prepositional phrases, verbals and verbal

Phrases and forms of word connections
The IC analysis splits a sentence into phrases that is groups of words connected together. The same groups are found in sentences if we use other types of syntactical analysis. The logical connecti

General remarks
The sentence was defined as a model of some fragment of the world. Besides it is a word or a group of words having predicativity. predicativity was defined as reference of the contents of the utter

Members of the sentence as semantic description of a sentence
The system of members of sentence was initially a syncretic description of form and meaning of elements of a sentence. The meaning of a sentence was identified with a logical union and namely the j

Valence Theory
There were many attempts to overcome inconsistencies of the method of members of sentence. One of the most systematic approaches is known as the valence theory. It is usually considered that the fo

Deep Case Theory
Transformational grammar was the starting point of a rather influentional theory of sentence meaning known as the Deep Case Theory or the Frame Theory. It should be immediately noted that this theo

Compositional Syntax
The concept named "Compositional Syntax" was first formulated and further developed in the Minsk State Linguistic University and more exactly at the department of History and Grammar of E

Хотите получать на электронную почту самые свежие новости?
Education Insider Sample
Подпишитесь на Нашу рассылку
Наша политика приватности обеспечивает 100% безопасность и анонимность Ваших E-Mail
Реклама
Соответствующий теме материал
  • Похожее
  • Популярное
  • Облако тегов
  • Здесь
  • Временно
  • Пусто
Теги