System of Declensions

The system of declension was inherited from PG. Adjectives had two declensions that had to do also with the category of determinationstrong(definite) and weak (indefinite) – and unlike nouns practically all adjectives could be declined both ways (by strong and weak declension). So an adjective did not belong to a particular declension, its declension depended on several factors that will be mentioned below:

 

Type of Declension Strong(definite) Weak(indefinite)
Borrowed inflections from a-stemando-stem from n-stem
Factors for distinguishing type of declension – Adj used attributively without any determiners (demonstrative pronouns); – Adj used predicatively. – Adj preceded by a demonstrative pronoun or Genitive Case of a noun;
Gender Neuter Neuter
Number Singular Plural Singular Plural
OE Cases Nominative blind blind blinde blindan
Genitive blindes blindra blindan blindra
Dative blindum blindum blindan blindum
Accusative blind blind blinde blindan
Instrumental blinde blindum blindan blindum
ME Cases disappeared blind blinde blinde blinde

 

There were exceptions from the rule: some adjectives were declined always strong (eall (all), maniζ (many), ōþer (other)), others – always weak (ilca (same)).

The endings of the adjectives showed the agreement between a noun and an adjective. There were a lot of homonymous forms (e.g. -um (OE) – N, Sg, Dat, strong; N, Pl, Dat, strong; N, Pl, Dat, weak; N, Pl, Instr, strong; N, Pl, Instr, weak; -e (ME) – N, Pl, strong; N, Sg, weak; N, Pl, weak) à the distinction between the declensions faded in ME and the declensions disappeared as far as there was no necessity any more to keep them.