Latin | English | ||||
Amicus (friend); the stem is amico-. The noun of the second declension | Friend | ||||
Case | Singularis | Pluralis | Case | Singular | Plural |
Nom. | amicus | amici | Nom. | friend | friends |
Gen. | amici | amicorum | Gen. | friend | friends |
Dat. | amico | amicis | Dat. | friend | friends |
Acc. | amicum | amicos | Acc. | friend | friends |
Voc. | amice | amici | Voc. | friend | friends |
Abl. | amico | amicis |
Critics by O.H.Jespersen.
It is seen from the example that the English Noun does not have a grammatical paradigm of its declension. Consequently, if there is no signs of material expression of changes (Grammatical Form), if there is no opposition or properly correlated relations, then there can not be a proper Grammatical Category as there is no base for it. It is the first drawback. Though O.H.Jespersen considers the Case as a Category of English. Then there is another drawback which is the lack of attention to the relations of possession that has a material expression in the grammatical form of the Possessive Case.
3). There are four cases. The principle of Syntactic Function.
Four cases in the light of the approach are stipulated by the syntactic position of the Noun in the Sentence. The English Noun can take the positions of the Subject, Attribute, Direct Object, Indirect Object. Consequently there are proper cases distinguished. They are presented in the table 3.4.
Table 3.4