6 топиков по иностранному языку (english)

Would you work if you didn t need the money? If not, what would you do? Well, I m not sure about this. Maybeyes, and maybe no. But, most likely, no. I think that the man, who earnedenough money to rest all the residuary life or the rest of life , canallow himself to do what he really wants to do. I dislike working very much.That s because I don t like doing everything related with necessity to me to dosomething I don t agree with. The absolute majority of jobs cannot be imaginedwithout such a necessity.

So I d like to earn much money, buy a good and modernhouse not far away from the city and leave the work. What would I do? Again,I m not absolutely sure. Possibly I d read classical and modern literature,visit interesting exhibitions, travel in this country and abroad, work inInternet and so on. There are a lot of intriguing activities which are possiblefor those who have much free time and much money to spend waste . Imaginethat you are allowed to have only 3 electrical things.

What would you choose? If I could only have three thingsthat worked by electricity, I d choose a computer, an electrical cooker and aTV-set. Why would I choose exactly these things? Because modern life, the lifein the beginning of the 3rd millennium, cannot be imagined withoutabove-named electrical appliances.A computer, if it has an Internet access, ofcourse, is the best way to communicate with people in this country and abroad.New methods of electronic connections allow us to get info about eventsworldwide, to write a letter to a friend, to buy any goods without standing upfrom your chair and many other intriguing activities.

So a computer is reallynecessary device with a lot of possibilities. My second choice, an electricalcooker, is also obligatory just because each man should eat some food each dayand restaurants or canteens are usually rather expensive.My last option is aTV-set which is one of the best and, without doubt, the cheapest way to restand to get operative news and information.

Describeany situation when quick-thinking was very important That was about 5 months ago, in thebeginning of 1999. That time I had my first university session and it wasn tvery easy period for me. I wasn t ready to the exams and only hoped for luck.The History of State and Law of Foreign Countries, which is one of the mostdifficult subjects, was our 3rd exam, but nevertheless I wasn t ableto prepare to it good enough.To get 4 or 5 it was necessary to know texts ofLaws and Constitutions perfectly while I didn t know them at all. Myexamination question concerned the Constitution of the 3rd Republicin France.

Absolutely not knowing the text, I attempted to dispute about someaspects of the Constitution with our teacher Timur Petrovich. In the heat ofthe fight he took the chrestomathy, opened the text and said me to read it just the thing I planned.After reading the text, I acknowledged my defeat,but, of course, there was no any problem to answer the rest of questionexcellently.

As a result, I got 5. Statementof Claim Fortunately, I ve never bought faultythings in shops. Therefore, I have nothing to tell you about. But I want toremind you about a well-known and specifically Russian problem.That is socalled law nihilism . It is expressed in the distrust of the population to thebasic principles of Law. That means, for example, that Russian people wouldn tgo to the court if they have some claims to the shop or manufacturer becausethey don t believe that court could solve their problems, that it can help peoplein many different ways. Russians suppose often that Law has been created toprotect the interests of the state or judicial persons, but not their ownrights.

In the situation when any American goes to the court or addresses toother officials practically all Russians wouldn t do anything. Even anassumption of the possibility of court hearings causes negative emotionalreaction in Russia.That s one of the most significant obstacles in the processof developing modern market economy in this country as well as a major judicialproblem. Whatis your choice stability or risk? Would you join perspective, but riskycompany or leave at your old job? Establishing a new company is aconsiderable risk even in the developed countries like the United States or GreatBritain.

Founders can get great profits or get into even greater debts.I thinkthat you should think if she really needs money or, may be, a quiet and stablelife is more important for her. Analysing both variants you should take intoaccount the situation with your family and children if you are able toprovide them with all necessary things and, which is often more important, withparent s care and love. You shouldn t forget also about your present job maybe there s the perspective of promotion and or the rise of wages.

Fromother point of view, old Russian aphorism says The person who doesn t risk,doesn t drink champagne i.e. no risk, no profits .After all, any decision will be rightif it is well thought-out and motivated. Howmuch should children respect their parents religious beliefs? The religion has been and is anintegral part of our life. Independently of our wishes, it s one of the mostsignificant institutions of the society and for many people it s somethingsacred, something that is prohibited to intervene in, something that cannot bedisturbed.

On the other hand, present-day laws provide absolute religiousfreedom, including the possibility of being an atheist.

So, there s acontradiction between the basics of religion and the statements of laws.A universal solution of this problemisn t possible, I can only propose that anyone who faces it should analyze whatis more important for him her the parents beliefs or his her own life. In anycase you shouldn t forget that insulting human s beliefs religious or not wouldn t result in anything positive.Only calm and open-hearted discussionwould help you to find a right decision.