рефераты конспекты курсовые дипломные лекции шпоры

Реферат Курсовая Конспект

Final creative works and changes in Charles Dickens personality

Final creative works and changes in Charles Dickens personality - раздел Литература, "Christmas stories" by Charles Dickens Final Creative Works And Changes In Charles Dickens Personality. Priva...

Final creative works and changes in Charles Dickens personality.

Privately in these early years, he was both domestic and social. He loved and family life and was a proud and efficient householder he once contemplated writing a cookbook. To his many children, he was a devoted and delightful father, at least when they were young relations with them proved less happy during their adolescence.

Apart from periods in Italy 1844-45 and Switzerland and France 1846-47 , he still lived in London, moving from an apartment in Furnivals Inn to larger houses as his income and family grew. Here he entertained his many friends, most of them popular authors, journalists, actors or artists, though some came from the law and other professions or from commerce and a few from the aristocracy.

Some friendships dating from his youth endured to the end, and, though, often exasperated by the financial demands of his parents and other relatives, he was very fond of some of his family and loyal to most of the rest. Some literary squabbles came later, but he was on friendly terms with most of his fellow authors, of the older generation as well as his own. Necessarily solitary while writing and during the long walks especially through the streets at night that became essential to his creative processes he was generally social at other times.

He enjoyed society that was unpretentious and conversation that was genial and sensible but not too intellectualized or exclusively literary. High society he generally avoided, after a few early incursions into the great houses he hated to be lionized or patronized. Скуратовская Л Творчество Диккенса, Москва, 1969. стр.92-96 He had about him a sort of swell and overflow as of a prodigality of life. an American journalist said. Everyone was struck by the brilliance of his eyes and his smart, even dandyish appearance I have a fondness of a savage for finery, he confessed. John Forster, his intimate friend and future biographer, recalled him at the Pickwick period the quickness, keenness, and a practical power, the eager, restless, energetic outlook on each several feature of his face seemed to tell so little of a student or a writer of books, and so much of a man of action or business in the world.

Light and motion flashed from every part of it. He was proud of his art and devoted to improving and using it to good ends his works would show, he wrote, that Cheap Literature is not behind-hand with the Age, but holds its place, and strives to do its duty, but his art never engaged all his formidable energies.

He had no desire to be narrowly literary. George H. Ford and L. Lane eds The Dickens Critics, London, 1961, reprinted 1976. pp. 148-158 A notable, though unsuccessful, demonstration of this was his being founder-editor in 1846 of the Daily News soon to become the leading liberal newspaper. His journalistic origins, his political convictions and readiness to act as a leader of opinion, and his wish to secure a steady income independent of his literary creativity and of any shifts in novel readers tastes made him attempt or plan several periodical ventures in the 1840s. The return to daily journalism soon proved a mistake - the biggest fiasco in a career that included few such misdirection and failures.

A more limited but happier exercise of his practical talents began soon afterward for more than a decade he directed, energetically and with great insight and compassion, a reformatory home for young female delinquents, financed by his wealthy friend Angela Burdett-Coutts.

The benevolent spirit apparent in his writings often found practical expression in his public speeches, fund-raising activities, and private acts of charity. J. Hillis Miller - Charles Dickens The World of His Novels, London, 1958, reissued 1969. pp. 62-69 Dombey and Son 1846-48 was a crucial novel in his development, a product of more thorough planning and maturer thought and the first in which a pervasive uneasiness about contemporary society takes the place of an intermittent concern with specific social wrongs Kathleen Tillotson. Using railways prominently an effectively, it was very up-to-date, though the questions pose included such perennial moral and religious challenges as are suggested by the child Pauls first words in the story Papa, what is money? Some of the corruptions of money and pride of place and limitations of respectable values are explored, virtue and human decency being discovered most often as elsewhere in Dickens among the poor, humble and simple.

In Pauls early death Dickens offered another famous pathetic episode in Mr. Dombey he made a more ambitious attempt than before at serious and internal characterization.

David Copperfield 1849-50 has been described as a holiday from this larger social concerns and most notable for its childhood chapters, an enchanting vein which he had never quite found before and which he was never to find again Edmund Wilson. Largely for his reason and its autobiographical interest, it has always been among his popular novels and was Dickens own favorite child.

It incorporates material from the autobiography he had recently begun but soon abandoned and is written in the first person, a new technique for him. David differs from his creator in many ways, however, though Dickens uses many early experiences that had meant much to him - his period of work in the factory while his father was jailed, his schooling and reading, his passion for Maria Beadnell, and more cursorily his emergence from parliamentary reporting into successful novel writing.

In Micawber the novel presents one of the Dickens characters whose imaginative potency extends far beyond the narratives in which they figure Pickwick and Sam Weller, Mrs. Gamp and Mr. Pecksniff, and Scrooge are some others.

Dickens journalistic ambitions at last found a permanent form in Household Words 1850-59 and its successor, All the Year Round 1859-88 . Popular weekly miscellanies of fiction, poetry, and essays on a wide range of topics, these had substantial and increasing circulations, reaching 300,000 for some of the Christmas Numbers. Dickens contributed some serials - the lamentable Childs History of England 1851-53 , Hard Times 1854 , A Tale of Two Cities 1859 , and Great Expectations 1860-61 - the essays, some of which were collected in Reprinted Pieces 1858 and The Uncommercial Traveller 1861, later amplified. Particularly in 1850-52 and during the Crimean War, he contributed many items on current political and social affairs in later years he wrote less - much less on politics - and the magazine was less political, too. The Uncommercial Traveller is a collection of Dickens memories rather than of his literary purposes but it is due to him to say that memory is often more startling in him that prophecy in anybody else. They have the character which belongs to all his vivid incidental writing that they attack themselves always to some text which is a fact rather than an idea. He was one of those sons of Eve who are fonder of the Tree of Life than of the Tree of Knowledge - even of the knowledge of good and of evil. He was in this profoundest sense a realist.

Critics have talked of an artist with his eye on the object.

Dickens as an essayist always had his eye on an object before he had the faintest notion of a subject. All these works of his can best be considered as letters they are notes of personal travel, scribbles in a diary about this or that that really happened.

But Dickens was one of the few men who have the two talents that are the whole of literature - and have them both together. First, he could make a thing happen over again and second he could make it happen better.

He can be called exaggerative but mere exaggeration conveys nothing of his typical talent. Mere whirlwinds of words, mere melodramas of earth and heaven do not affect us as Dickens affects us, because they are exaggerations of nothing. If asked for an exaggeration of something, their inventors would be entirely dumb. They would not know how to exaggerate a broom-stick. He always began with a fact even when he was most fanciful and even when he drew the long bow he was careful to hit the white.

Other distinguished novelists contributed serials, including Mrs. Gaskell, Wilkie Collins, Charles Reade, and Bulwer Lytton. The poetry was uniformly feeble Dickens was imperceptive here. The reportage, often solidly based, was bright sometimes painfully so in manner. His conduct of these weeklies shows his many skills as editor and journalist but also some limitations in his tastes and intellectual ambitions. The contents are revealing in relation to his novels he took responsibility for all the opinions expressed for articles were anonymous and selected and amended contributions accordingly thus comments on topical events and so on may generally be taken as representing his opinions, whether or not he wrote them. No English author of comparable status has devoted twenty years of his maturity to such unremitting editorial work, and the weeklies success been due not only to his illustrious name but also to his practical sagacity and sustained industry.

Even in his creative work, as his eldest son said, no city clerk was ever more methodical or orderly than he no humdrum, monotonous, conventional task could ever have been discharged with more punctuality, or with more businesslike regularity.

Stephen Wall ed Charles Dickens A Critical Anthology, London, 1970. pp. 70-92 The novels of these years, Bleak House 1852-53 , Hard Times 1854 , and Little Dorrit 1855-57 , were much darker than their predecessors.

Presenting a remarkably inclusive and increasingly somber picture of contemporary society, they were inevitably often seen at the time as fictionalized propaganda about ephemeral issues. They are much more than this, though it is never easy to state how Dickens imagination transforms their many topicalities into an artistically coherent vision that transcends their immediate historical context. Similar question are raised by his often basic fictional characters, places and institutions on actual originals.

He once spoke of his minds taking a fanciful photograph of a scene, and there is a continual interplay between photographic realism and fancy or imagination. He describes London like a special correspondent for posterity Walter Bagehot, 1858 and posterity has certainly found in his fiction the response of an acute, knowledgeable, and concerned observer to the social and political developments of the moving age. In the novels of the 1850s, he is politically more despondent emotionally more tragic.

The satire is harsher, the humor less genial and abundant, the happy-endings more subdued than in early fiction. Technically, the later novels are more coherent, plots being more fully related to themes, and themes being often expressed through a more insistent sue of imagery and symbols grim symbols, too, such as the fog in Bleak House or the prison Little Dorrit. His art here is more akin to poetry than to what is suggested by the photographic or journalistic comparisons.

Dickensian characterization continued in the sharply defined and simplified grotesque and comic figures, such as Chadband in Bleak House or Mrs. Sparsit in Hard Times but large-scale figures of this tyle are less frequent the Gamps and Micawbers belong to the first half of his career. Characterization also has become more subordinate to the general purpose and design moreover Dickens is presenting characters of greater complexity provoke more complex responses in the reader William Dorrit for instance. Even the juvenile leads had usually been thinly conceived conventional figures, are not often more complicated in their make-up and less easily rewarded by good fortune.

With his secular hopes diminishing, Dickens becomes more concerned with the great final secret of all life - a phrase from Little Dorrit, where the spiritual dimension of his work is most overt. Critics disagree as to how far so worldly a novelist succeeds artistically in enlarging his view to include the religious.

These novels, too, being manifestly an ambitious attempt to explore the prospects of humanity at this time raise questions, still much debated, about the intelligence and profundity of his understanding of society. Dickens spirits and confidence in the future had indeed declined. 1855 was a year of much unsettled discontent for him, his friend Forster recalled, partly for political reasons or, as Forster hints, his political indignation was exacerbated by a discontent that had original purposes. The Crimean War, besides exposing governmental inefficiency, was distracting attention from the poverty, hunger, and ignorant desperation at home. In Little Dorrit, I have been blowing off a little of indignant steam which would otherwise bow me up, he wrote, but I have no present political faith or hope - not a grain.

Not only were the present government and Parliament contemptible but representative government is become altogether a failure with us the whole thing has broken down and has no hope in it. Nor had he a coherent alternative to suggest.

This desperation coincided with an acute state of personal unhappiness. The brief tragicomedy of Maria Beadnells reentry into his life, in 1855, finally destroyed one nostalgic illusion and also betrayed a perilous emotional immaturity and hunger. He how openly identified himself with some of the sorrows dramatized in the adult David Copperfield Why is it, as with poor David, a sense come always crushing on me, now, when I fall into low spirits, as of one happiness I have missed in life and one friend and companion I have never made? Уилсон Энгус - Мир Чарльза Диккенса, Москва, 1975. стр.48-52 This comes from the correspondence with Forster in 1854-55, which contains the first admissions of his marital unhappiness by 1856 he is writing, I find a skeleton in my domestic closet is becoming a pretty big one by 1857-58, as Forster remarks, an unsettled feeling had become almost habitual with him, and the satisfactions which home should have supplied, and which indeed were essential requirements of his nature, he had failed to find in his home. From May 1858, Catherine Dickens lived apart from him. A painful scandal arose, and Dickens did not act at this time with tact, patience, or consideration. The affair disrupted some of his friendships and narrowed his social circle, but surprisingly it seems not to have damaged his popularity with the public.

Catherine Dickens maintained a dignified silence, and most of Dickens family and friends, including his official biographer, Forster, were discreetly reticent about the separation. Not until 1939 did one of his children Kate speaking posthumously through conversations recorded by a friend, offer a candid inside account, it was discreditable to him, and his self-justifying letters must be viewed with caution.

He there dated the unhappiness of his marriage back to 1838, attributed to his wife various peculiarities of temperament including her sometimes laboring under a mental disorder, emphatically agreed with her statement that she felt herself unfit for the life she had to lead as my wife, and maintained that she never cared for the children nor they for her. In more temperate letters, where he acknowledged her amiable and complying qualities, he simply and more acceptably asserted that their temperaments were utterly incomparable.

She was, apparently, pleasant but rather limited such faults as she had were rather negative than positive.

Though family traditions from a household that knew the Dickenses well speaks of her as a whiney woman and a shaving little understanding of, or patience with, the artistic temperament.

Dickens self-justifying letters lack candor in omitting to mention Ellen Ternan, an actress 27 years his junior his passion for whom had precipitated the separation. Two months earlier he had written more frankly to an intimate friend The domestic unhappiness remains so strong upon me that I can not write, and waking cannot rest, one minute.

I have never known a moments peace or content, since the last night of The Frozen Deep. The Frozen Deep was a play in which he and Nelly as Ellen was called had performed together in August 1857. She was an intelligent girl, of an old theatrical family reports speak of her as having a pretty face and well-developed figure - or passably pretty not much of an actress. She left the stage in 1860 after Dickens death she married a clergyman and helped him run a school.

The affair was hushed up until the 1930s, and evidence about it remains scanty, but every addition confirms that Dickens was deeply attached to her and that their relationship lasted until his death. It seems likely that she became his mistress, though probably not until the 1860s assertions that a child, or children, resulted remain unproved. Similarly, suggestions that the anguish experienced by some of the lovers in the later novels may reflect Dickens own feelings remain speculative.

It is tempting indeed, to associate Nelly with some of their heroines who are more spirited and complex, less of the legless angel, than most of their predecessors, especially as her given names, Ellen Lawless, seemed to be echoed by those of heroines in the three novels - Estella, Bella and Helena Landless - but nothing definite is known about how she responded to Dickens, what she felt for him at the time, or how close any of these later love stories were to aspects or phrases of their relationship.

G.K. Chesterton - Charles Dickens, London, 1903, reprinted 1977. pp. 114-127 There is nothing very remarkable in the story, commended one early transmitter of it, and this seems just. Many middle-aged men feel an itch to renew their emotional lives with a pretty young girl, even if, unlike Dickens, they cannot plead indulgence for the wayward and unsettled feeling which is part of the tenure on which one holds an imaginative life. But the eventual disclosure of this episode caused surprise, shock or piquant satisfaction, being related of a man whose rebelliousness against his society had seemed to take only impeccably reformist shapes.

A critic in 1851, listing the reasons for his unique popularity, had cited above all, his deep reverence for the household sanctities, his enthusiastic worship of the household gods. After these disclosures he was, disconcertingly or intriguingly a more complex man and, partly as a consequence, Dickens the novelist also began to be seen as more complex, less conventional, than had been realized.

The stimulus was important, though Nellys significance, biographically and critically, has proved far from inexhaustible. In the longer term, Kathleen Tillotsons remark is more suggestive his life-long love affair with his reading public, when all is said, is by far the most interesting love-affair of his life. This took a new form, about the time of Dickens separation from his wife, in his giving public readings from his works, and it is significant that, when trying to justify their enterprise as certain to succeed, he referred to that particular relation which subsists between me and public.

The remark suggests how much Dickens valued the public affection, not only as a stimulus to his creativity and a condition for his commercial success but also as a substitute for the love he could not find at home. He had been toying with the idea of turning paid reader since 1853, when he began giving occasional readings in aid of charity.

The paid series began in April 1858, the immediate impulse being to find some energetic distraction from his marital unhappiness. But the readings drew on more permanent elements in him and his art his remarkable histrionic talents, his love of theatricals and of seeing and delighting an audience, and the eminently performable nature of his fiction. Moreover, he could earn more by reading than by writing, and more certainly it was easier to force him to repeat a performance than create a book. Tired and ailing though he was, he remained inventive and adventurous in his final novels.

A Tale of Two Cities 1859 was an experiment, relying less than before on characterization, dialogue and humour. It was well for him, at any rate, that the people raised in France. It was well for him, at any rate, that the guillotine was set up in the Place de la Concorde.

Unconsciously, but not accidentally, Dickens was here working out the whole true comparison between swift revolutionism in Paris and slow evolutionism in London. Sidney Carton is one of those sublime ascetics whose head offends them, and who cut it off. For him at least it was better that the blood should flow in Paris than that the wine should flow any longer in London. And if I say that even now the guillotine might be the best cure for many a London lawyer. An exciting and compact narrative, it lacks too many of his strength to count among his major works.

Sydney Cartons self-sacrifice was found deeply moving by Dickens and by many readers Dr. Manette now seems a more impressive achievement in serious characterizations. The French Revolution scenes are vivid, if superficial in historical understanding. Great Expectations resembles Copperfield in being a first person narration and in drawing on parts of Dickens personality and experience. Compact like its predecessors, it lacks the panoramic inclusiveness of Bleak House, Little Dorrit, and Our Mutual Friend, but though not his most ambitious, it is his most finely achieved novel.

The hero Pips mind is explored with great subtlety, and his development through a childhood and youth beset with hard tests of character is traced critically but sympathetically. Various great expectations in the book found ill founded - a comment as much on the values of the age as on characters weaknesses and misfortune.

Our Mutual Friend, a large inclusive novel, continues this critique monetary and class values. London is now grimmer than ever before, and the corruption, complacency, and superficiality of respectable society are fiercely attacked. Many new elements are introduced into Dickens fictional world, but his handling of the old comic - eccentrics are sometimes tiresomely mechanical. How the unfinished Edwin Drood would have developed is uncertain. Here again Dickens left panoramic fiction to concentrate on a limited private action.

The central figure was evidently to be John Jasper, eminent respectability as a cathedral organist was in extreme contrast to his haunting low opium dens and, out of violent sexual jealousy, murdering his nephew. It would have been his most elaborate treatment of the themes of crime, evil, and psychological abnormality that had recurred throughout his novels a great celebrator of life, he was also obsessed with death. How greatly Dickens personally had changed appears in remarks by friends who met him again, after many years, during the American reading tour in 1867-68. I sometimes think, wrote one, I must have known two individuals bearing the same name, at various periods of my own life. But just as the fiction, despite many developments still contained stylistic and narrative features continuous with the earliest work, so, too, the man remained a human hurricane though he had aged considerably, his health had deteriorated, and his nerves had been jungled by traveling ever since his being in a railway accident in 1865. Other Americans noted that, though grizzled, he was as quick and elastic in his movements as ever. His photographs, wrote journalist after one of the readings, give no idea of his genial expression.

To us he appears like hearty, companionable man, with a deal of fun in him, but that very day Dickens was writing, I am nearly used up, and listing the afflictions now telling heavily upon me. His pride and the old-trouper tradition made him conceal his sufferings.

And, if sometimes by an effort of will, his old high spirits were often on display.

His fame remained undiminished, though critical opinion was increasingly hostile to him. Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, noting the immense enthusiasm for him during the American tour, remarked One can hardly take in the whole truth about it, and feel the universality of his fame. But in many respects he was a sad man in these later years.

He never was tranquil and relaxed. Various old friends were now estranged or dead or for other reason less available he was now leading a less social life and spending more time with young friends of a caliber inferior to his former circle. His sons were caused much worry and disappointment, all his fame goes for nothing, said a friend, Since he has not the one thing. He is very unhappy in his children. His wife was not all dreary, however. He loved his country house, Gads Hill, and he could still warm the social atmosphere wherever he appeared with that summer glow which seemed to attend him. T. A. Trollope, who wrote that, despaired of giving people who had not met him any idea of The general charm of his manner. His laugh was brimful of enjoyment. His enthusiasm was boundless. He was a hearty man, a large-hearted man .a strikingly manly man. Only a week before his death he was at the theatre, In high spirits, brim-full of joie-de-vivre.

His talk had all the sparkle of champagne, and he himself kept laughing at the majesty of his own absurdities, as one droll thought followed another .at times still so young and almost boyish in his gaiety.

Lord Redesdale, Memories, 1915 His health remained precarious after the punishing American tour and was further impaired by his addiction to giving the strenuous Sikes and Nancy reading. His farewell readings tour was abandoned when, in April 1869, he collapsed. He began writing another novel and gave a short farewell season of readings in London, ending with the famous speech, From these garish lights I vanish now for evermore - words repeated, less than three months later, on his funeral card. He died suddenly at Gads Hill on June 9, 1870, and was buried in Westminster Abbey. People all over the world mourned the loss of a friend as well as a great entertainer and creative artist and one of the acknowledged influences upon the spirit of the age. George H. Ford - A Second Guide to Research, London, 1978. pp.34-113 4. Review about Charles Dickens creativity.

Ralph Waldo Emerson, attending one of Dickens readings in Boston, laughed as if he must crumble to pieces, but, discussing Dickens afterward, he said I am afraid that he has too much talent for his genius it is a fearful locomotive to which he is bound and can never be free from it nor set to rest. He daunts me! I have not the key. There is no simple key to so prolific and multifarious an artist nor to the complexities of the man, and interpretation of birth is made harder by his possessing and feeling to need to exercise so many talents besides his imagination. How his fiction is related to these talents - practical, journalistic, oratorical, histrionic - remains controversial.

Also the geniality and unequaled comedy of the novels must be related to the sufferings, errors and self-pity of their author and to his concern both for social evils and perennial grieves and limitations of humanity.

The novels cover a wide range, social, moral, emotional, and psychological.

Thus, he is much concerned with very ordinary people but also with abnormality e.g. eccentricity, depravity, madness, hallucinations, dream states. He is both the most imaginative and fantastic and the most topical and documentary of great novelists. He is unequal too a wonderfully inventive and poetic writer, he can also, even in his mature novels, write with a painfully slack conventionality. Biographers have only since the mid-20th enough to explore the complexity of Dickens nature.

Critics have always been challenged by his art, though from the start it contained enough easily acceptable ingredients, evident skill and gusto, to ensure popularity. The earlier novels were and by and large have continued to be Dickens most popular works The Pickwick Papers, Oliver Twist, Martin Chuzzlewit, A Christmas Carol, and David Copperfield. Critics began to demur against the later novels, deploring the loss of the freer comic spirit, baffled by the more symbolic mode of his art, and uneasy when the simpler reformism over isolated issues became a more radical questioning of social and assumptions and institutions.

Dickens was never neglected or forgotten and never lost his popularity, but for 70 years after his death he received remarkably little serious attention George Gissing, G.K. Chesterton, and George Bernard Shaw being notably exceptions. F.R. Leavis, later to revise his opinion, was speaking for many, in 1948, when he asserted that the adult mind doesnt as a rule find in Dickens a challenge to an unusual and sustained seriousness Dickens was indeed a great genius, but the genius was that of a great entertainer.

Modern Dickens criticism dates from 1940-41, with the very different impulses given by George Orwell, Edmund Wilson, and Humphry House, in the 1950s, a substantial reassessment and re-editing of the works began, his finest artistry and greatest depth now being discovered in the later novels - Bleak House, Little Dorrit, and Great Expectations - and less unanimously in Hard Times and Our Mutual Friend.

Scholars have explored his working methods, his relations with the public, and the ways in which he was simultaneously an eminently Victorian figure and an author not of an age but for all time. Biographically, little had been added to Forsters massive and intelligent Life 1872-74 , except the Ellen Ternan story, until Edgar Johnsons in 1952. Since then, no radically new view has emerged, though several works - including those by Joseph Gold 1972 and Fred Kaplan 1975 - have given particular phases or aspects fuller attention. The centenary in 1970 demonstrated a critical consensus about his standing second only to William Shakespeare in English literature, which would have seemed incredibly 40 or even 20 years earlier.

Chapter-II Charles Dickens s Christmas stories. 1.

– Конец работы –

Эта тема принадлежит разделу:

"Christmas stories" by Charles Dickens

Much in his work could appeal to simple and sophisticated, to the poor and the Queen, and technological developments as well as the qualities of his… His long career fluctuations in the reception and sales of individual novels,… The range, compassion, and intelligence of his apprehension of his society and its shortcomings enriched his novels…

Если Вам нужно дополнительный материал на эту тему, или Вы не нашли то, что искали, рекомендуем воспользоваться поиском по нашей базе работ: Final creative works and changes in Charles Dickens personality

Что будем делать с полученным материалом:

Если этот материал оказался полезным ля Вас, Вы можете сохранить его на свою страничку в социальных сетях:

Все темы данного раздела:

Beginning of literary career of Charles Dickens
Beginning of literary career of Charles Dickens. Charles John Huffam Dickens was born February 7, 1812, in Portsmouth, Hampshire, but left it in infancy. His happiest childhood years were spent in

Charles Dickens works written in Christmas story genre
Charles Dickens works written in Christmas story genre. A Christmas Carol 1843 , suddenly conceived and written in a few weeks was the first of these Christmas Books a new literary genre thu

The essence of Christmas stories and characterization of the main heroes
The essence of Christmas stories and characterization of the main heroes. of these works Who ever understood children better than he? Other writers have wondered at them, he understands them the ro

The differential features between Dickens and Irvings Christmas stories
The differential features between Dickens and Irvings Christmas stories. Dickens, Charles is fairly considered as the first writer who invented this genre in England. Christmas stories appea

Хотите получать на электронную почту самые свежие новости?
Education Insider Sample
Подпишитесь на Нашу рассылку
Наша политика приватности обеспечивает 100% безопасность и анонимность Ваших E-Mail
Реклама
Соответствующий теме материал
  • Похожее
  • Популярное
  • Облако тегов
  • Здесь
  • Временно
  • Пусто
Теги