ÁÈÁËÈÎÃÐÀÔÈß

AUport G. ¹. (1937). Personality: Ë psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Allpon G. ¹. (1942). The use of personal documents in psychological science. New York: Social Science Research Council. Bulletin 49.

AUport G. ¹. (1950). The individual and his religion. New York: Macmillan.

AUport G. ¹ (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations tor a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

AUport G. ¹. (1960). Personality and social encounter: Selected essays. Boston: Beacon Press.

AUport G. ¹. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

AUport G. ¹. (Ed.) (1965). Letters from Jenny. New York: Harcourt. Brace & World.

AUport G. ¹. (1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologists, 21, 1-10.

Allpon G. ¹. (1967). Autobiography. In E. Boring, G. Lindzey (Eds). A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 5, pp. 1-25). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

AUport G. ¹ (1968a). The person in psychology: Selected essays. Boston: Beacon Press.

AUport G. ¹. (1968b). Personality: Contemporary viewpoints (1). In D. Sills (Ed.). International encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.

AUport G. ¹., AUport F. H. (1928). A-S reaction study. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

AUport G. ¹., Vemon P. £., Linrhey G. (1960). A study of values (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Baldwin A. (1942). Personal structure analysis: A statistical method for investigating the single personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 37, 163-183.

Baumeister R. /•".. Tice D. M. (1988). Meta-traits. journal of Personality, 56, 571-598.

Bern D.J.. Allen A. (1974). On predicting some ot the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behauor. Psychological Review, 81, 506-520.

Carlson R. (1988). Exemplary lives: The use ot psycliobiography for theory development. Journal of Personality, 56, 105-138.

Cattell R. B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality. New York: World Book.

Cattell R. B. (1949). The dimensions of culture patterns by factorization of national character, journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 443-469.

Caltell R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic, theoretical, and factual study. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cattell R. B. (1960). The multiple abstract variance analysis equations and solutions: for nature-nurture research on continuous variables Psychological Review. 67, 353-372,

Cattell R. B. (1965). The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore: Penguin Books.

Catlell R. B. (1974). Autobiography. In G. Lindzey (Ed.). A history of psychology in autobiogra­phy (Vol. 6, pp. 59-100). Englcuood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Cattell R Â. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum.

Cattell R Â (1979). Personality and learning iheorv: The sirutrurc ot personality in its environ­ment (Vol. 1). New York: Springer.

Cattell R B. (1982). The inheritance of personality and ability. Now York: Academic Press.

Cattell R. B. (1987). Beyondism: Religion from science. New York: Praeger.

Cattell R. Â., Bmel II. Hartman II. P. (l!)52). ;Vi auomjn ai a more refined definition of (he cultural dimensions of syntality in modern nations. American Sociological Review. 17, 408-421.

Cat/el! R. Â.. Eher II. XX'., Taisuoka M. M. (1970). Handbook for the 16 personality factor question­naire. Champaign, IL: IPA'I.

Corcoran D W (3964). The relation between inlroversion and saliva!ion. American Journal of Psychology, 77. 298-300.

Epstein S. (1979). The stability of behavior. I. On predicting most of the people most ot the lime. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37, 1097-1126.

Epstein S. (1983). A research paradigm for the study or personality and emotions. In M. M. Page (Ed.). Personality: Current theory and research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Epstein S. (1986). Does aggregation produce spuriously high estimaics of behavioral stability? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1 199- 1210.

Evans R. (1971). Gordon Aliport: A conversation. Psychology Today. April, 62-65.

Eysenck H.J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Ruutledge & Kegan Paul.

Eysenck H.J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routiedge & Kegan Paul.

Eysenck H.J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles Ñ Thomas.

Eysenck H.J. (1970). The .structure or human personality (3rd ed.). London: Methuen.

Eysenck H.J. (1975). The inequality ot man. London: Temple Smith.

Eysenck II. J. (1976). Sex and personality. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Eysenck H.J. (1982). Personality, genetics and behavior. New York: Praeger.

Eysenck H.J., Eysenck M. V. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum.

Eysenck H.J.. Ei/senck S. B. (1975). Manual ot the Lvscnek Personality Questionnaire. San Diego, Ñ Ë: Ed ITS.

ii/senck S. Â.. Eysenck H.J. (1973). Test-rctot reliabilities of a new personality questionnaire for children. British Journal of Educational PsAchclogs. »3, 26-130.

Kenrick D. Ò.. Stringfiehl D. 0. (1980). [Vrsoiv'itv trails and ihe eye oi i lie beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boiiiiciives in ;.he search to' consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87, 88- 10 i.

Kerlinger E. Ë'.(1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.) New York: Holt, Rineliart and Winston.

LamiellJ. T. (1987). The psychology ol personality: An epislemok.'gical inquiry. New York: Colum­bia University Press.

Loehlin J. C. WiHerman I... Horn I M. (1988). Human behavior genetics. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 101-133.

Maddi S. R. (1989). Personality theories: Ë comparaiive analysis (5'h ed.). Hornewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

Mischel IV". (1968). Personality and assessment. New York. Wile.

Mische! XV. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning, reconcc-pniali&non of personality. Psycho­logical Review, 80, 252-283,

Mische! XV., Peake P. K. (1982). Beyond deja vu in the search for cross-situalioual consistency. Psychological Review. 89 730-755.

Mischel XX'., Peake P. K. (1983). Analyzing the construction of consistency in personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.)., Personality: Current theory and research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Paige J. (1966). Letters I mm Jenny: An approach to the clinical analysis of personality structure by computer. In P. Slone (Ed.). The general inquirer: A computer approach to conteni analysis. Cambridge, MA: ÌÏ Press.

Peivin !.. Ë. (1989). Personality Theory and research (5th ed.). New York: Willey.

RushtonJ. P., Brainerd C.J., Pressley M. (1983). Behavioral development and construct validity:

The principle of aggregation. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 18—38.

Ryckman R. M. (1989). Theories of personality (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Schweder R. A. (1982). Fact and artifact in trait perception: The systematic distortion hypothesis.

In B. A. Maher, W. B. Maher (Eds.). Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 11).

New York: Academic Press. Spranger E. (1922). Lebensformen (3rd ed.). Halle, Germany: Niemeyer. (Trans: P. Pigors, Types

of men. Halle: Niemeyer, 1928.) Wiggins J. S. (1984). Cattell's system from the perspective of mainstream personality theory.

Multivariate Behavioral research, 19, 176-190. Wilson G. (1978). Introversion/extroversion. In H. London, J. E. Exner (Eds.), Dimensions of

personality (pp. 217-261). New York: Wiley.