рефераты конспекты курсовые дипломные лекции шпоры

Реферат Курсовая Конспект

No irretrievable breakdown--------One of the 5 facts proved--------No divorce possible

No irretrievable breakdown--------One of the 5 facts proved--------No divorce possible - раздел Образование, MARRIAGE AND CIVIL PARTNERSHIP ...

Buffery v. Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365 Concerning: the ground for divorce Facts It was found by the judge that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The couple had nothing in common, never went out and were unable to communicate with each other. However, none of the five facts could be made out. Legal principle A divorce could not be granted. Even if the marriage had broken down irretrievably, a divorce could only be granted where one of the five facts was made out. The couple would have to separate for two years in order to get a divorce.

Fact 1. Adultery

Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, section 1(2)(a) (...) that the respondent has committed adultery and the petitionerfinds it intolerable to live with the respondent.

 

KEY DEFINITION Adulteryis voluntary sexual intercourse between a man and a woman, one or both of whom is married. Sexual intimacy short of sexual intercourse will not amount to adultery.

 

In order to rely on the adultery fact, it is necessary to show two things: - the respondent has committed adultery - the petitioner finds it intolerable to live with the respondent.

 

Reading:

Cleary v. Cleary [1974] 1 WLR 73 Concerning: the adultery fact Facts The wife committed adultery. The husband forgave her and they were reconciled. However, this was short lived and the wife left the husband again. The husband then petitioned for divorce. Legal principle The Court of Appeal accepted that there was adultery and that following the wife's conduct during the unsuccessful attempt at reconciliation the husband found it intolerable to live with her. A divorce was available, therefore, on the adultery fact.

Fact 2. Behavior

The 'behaviour' fact is found in section 1(2)(b), Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.

Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, section 1(2)(b) (...) that the respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent.

 

Reading: Cases:

O'Neill v. O'Neill (1975) Husband was DIY fanatic who took eight months to replace toilet door: BEHAVIOUR FACT DEMONSTRATED
Pheasant v. Pheasant (1972) Wife never engaged in spontaneous displays of affection: BEHAVIOUR FACT NOT DEMONSTRATED
Lines v. Lines (1963) Husband required wife to tickle his feet for hours every evening: BEHAVIOUR FACT DEMONSTRATED

1. In Birch v. Birch [1992], the wife petitioned for divorce on the basis of her husband's unreasonable behavior. She claimed that his attitude to her was dogmatic, nationalistic and dictatorial. She said that she was sensitive and had taken a passive role during their 20-year marriage, putting aside her own interests until the children had grown up. The county court judge dismissed her petition, but the Court of Appeal allowed her appeal and granted a decree because the judge had used an objective test when the correct test was subjective.

2. In O'Neill v. O'Neill the petitioner stated that her husband had a withdrawn personality, had doubted the paternity of their children, and had spent two years 'improving' the flat, which included mixing cement on the living-room floor and leaving the lavatory door off for about eight months.

3. Some behavior, however, may be too trivial and a decree will be refused, as it was in Buffery v. Buffery above, where the wife alleged that her husband was insensitive, never took her out, and after their children had left home they had nothing to talk about and nothing in common. Her petition was dismissed, as her husband's behavior was insufficient to satisfy the behaviour ground.

PROBLEM AREA

Blameless behaviour A divorce may therefore be granted even though a respondent is not responsible for his or her own 'behavior'. The issue is raised particularly where the behaviour is caused by a medical condition. On the one hand, it might be thought harsh on a spouse to be divorced based on behaviour over which they had no control On the other, the courts are aware that caring for an ill spouse can be an enormous burden. In Katzv. /fafr (1972) a wife was able to get a divorce from a husband who suffered from manic depression, whose behaviour was concerning and greatly disturbed the wife. In Thurlow v. Thurlow [1976], the wife was an epileptic who suffered from a severe neurological disorder. She was bed-ridden and bad-tempered, threw objects at her husband and wandered the streets causing him distress. He worked full-time and found it difficult to care for her, and the stress affected his health. Judge granted a decree.

 

Fact 3. Desertion

Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, section 1(2)(c) (...) that the respondent has deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of at least two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition.

 

Fact 4. Two-year separation

Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, section 1(2)(d) (...) that the parties to the marriage have lived apart for a continuous period of at least two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition.. .and the respondent consents to a decree being granted.

– Конец работы –

Эта тема принадлежит разделу:

MARRIAGE AND CIVIL PARTNERSHIP

England and Wales... LECTURE... MARRIAGE AND CIVIL PARTNERSHIP Introduction...

Если Вам нужно дополнительный материал на эту тему, или Вы не нашли то, что искали, рекомендуем воспользоваться поиском по нашей базе работ: No irretrievable breakdown--------One of the 5 facts proved--------No divorce possible

Что будем делать с полученным материалом:

Если этот материал оказался полезным ля Вас, Вы можете сохранить его на свою страничку в социальных сетях:

Все темы данного раздела:

Marriage. The right to marry
KEY DEFINITION MARRIAGE is an agreement by which a man and a woman enter into certain legal relationship with each other and which creates and imposes mutual rights and

Gender Recognition Act 2004, section 2(1)
1 ... the [Gender Recognition] Panel must grant the application if satisfied that the applicant - (a) has or has had gender dysphoria, (b

Civil Partnership
Reading:In Fitzpatrick v. Sterling Housing Association Ltd [1999] 2 FLR 1027, the question was whether Mr Fitzpatrick who had lived with his male partner in a stable

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MARRIAGE AND CIVIL PARTNERSHIP
MCA: Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 CPA: Civil Partnership Act 2004   Adultery is a fact which can be used to establish the grou

Answer guidelines
1. The differences are of no practical significance. For example, where there is adultery, the unreasonable behaviour fact can be relied upon. 2. The differences are symbolically impor

Void and Voidable Marriages (the Law of Nullity)
Grounds on which a Marriage is Void Section 11 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 provides that a marriage is void where: '(a) ... it is no

Grounds on which a Marriage may be Voidable
Section 12 MCA 1973 provides that a marriage is voidable where: (a) the marriage has not been consummated owing to the incapacity of either party to consummate it; (b)

PROBLEM AREA
Inability to consummate after marriage A popular scenario in a problem question is where one of the parties to the marriage becomes physically unable to consummate the m

VOIDABLE MARRIAGE
-The marriage can only be set aside if there is a court order. Without a court order annulling the marriage, it is a valid one   - Only the parties to the marriage can

The Legal Consequences of Marriage and Civil Partnership
(a) Separate Legal Personalities In Balfour v. Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571, which is still the leading case, the Court of Appeal held that an agreement between a

SEMINAR 1
REVISION CHECKLIST What you need to know: 1. The grounds on which a marriage or civil pa

Property Rights of Married Couples
There isno concept of a pre­sumption of joint ownership of property in English law. However, it is possible to acquire a right of ownership by claiming an inter­est under a

Many cohabiting couples believe that they have the same rights as married couples, but they are badly mistaken.
Reading: Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557 Concerning: definition of living 'together as husband and wife' Fa

Cohabitation contracts
Reading: Sutton v. Mischon de Reya [2004] 1 FLR 837 Concerning: enforceability of cohabitation contracts Facts Mr Sutton and Mr Sta

Resulting Trust
KEY DEFINITION A resulting trust (on the basis of law, на основании закона)is presumed to arise when A contributes to the purchase price of a piece of property which is

Constructive Trust
KEY DEFINITION In order to establish a constructive trust, it is necessary to show: 1. A common intention to share ownership. This is proved by evidence of an express

Proprietary Estoppel
KEY DEFINITION For in X to be able to establish a proprietary estoppelit must be shown that: - the owner of the property assured or promised X an interest in the prope

Answer guidelines
In this problem question you will need to start by ascertaining who has the legal title le property, that is, who the registered owner is. In this case, it is Alan. There is no express trust and so

Question 1
The marriage between Michael and Sarah has encountered difficulties, and the couple have decided to part amicably. They are both keen to go their separate ways with no financial responsibilities to

KEY DEFINITION
Separationrequires the parties to live in separate households. Normally this will be in separate houses, but it is possible for them to live separate lives under the same

Bars to divorce
1) Section 3(1), MCA states that it is not possible to petition for a divorce until you have been married for one year. 2) Section 5, MCA provides a bar but this can only

Effects of Divorce
- free to remarry -financial provision and property adjustment -an effect on a will (termination)

Recognition of a Foreign Divorce
Reading: The English courts have discretion to refuse recognition of a foreign divorce, whether or not it was obtained in proceedings. Thus, for example, the court may refuse to re

Question 1
Fred and Wilma married 10 years ago, and were initially very happy. However Fred started to go out with his friends every Saturday night, living Wilma at home with their daughter, Pebbles. Fred fre

KEY DEFINITION
Joint will. A single document executed by two or more persons as the will of all of them. It is prohibited to left joint will in Ukraine. Mutual

Question 1
Victoria and James met 15 years ago and began to cohabit. They have four children, aged 2, 4, 6 and 8. Shortly after they met, James bought a plot of land for £5,000 and registered the proper

PARENTS AND CHILDREN
1. Who are the parents of the child? 2. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 3. Parental responsibility 1. Who are the parents of the child?

KEY DEFINITION
Under a surrogacy arrangement a couple ('the commissioning couple') ask a woman ('the surrogate mother') to carry a child for them. The agreement is that shortly after bir

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, section 28 (2) if- (a) at the time of the placing in her of the embryo or the

Parental responsibility
Children Act 1989, section 3(1) 'In this Act "parental responsibility" means all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities and authori

PROBLEM AREA
Section 2(7) of the Children Act 1989 appears to suggest that a parent with parental responsibility can act alone and need not consult with anyone else. However, the courts have not interpreted the

Answer guidelines
You will want to discuss the following issues: - What is parental responsibility? It is far from clear what parental responsibility is and yet that is key if we are to decide who should ge

Question 1
Last year, Rose (a single woman) had a brief affair with Fred, a wealthy married man 20 years older than herself. After Rose had ended the relationship, she discovered that she was pregnant. Fred o

Suggested answer
Here we are asked to advise Rose, the mother of 6-month-old John, born as the result of a brief affair with Fred. First, Rose’s mind can put at rest to some extend by telling her that as t

MARRIAGE AND CIVIL PARTNERSHIP

PROPERTY CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIONSHIPS
In Ghaidan v Mendoza what kind of couple was the court willing to state

DIVORCE AND DISSOLUTION
What is the ground for divorce?  

THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF DEATH IN THE FAMILY
Who can make a will?  

PARENTS AND CHILDREN
Who is the mother of a child?  

Хотите получать на электронную почту самые свежие новости?
Education Insider Sample
Подпишитесь на Нашу рассылку
Наша политика приватности обеспечивает 100% безопасность и анонимность Ваших E-Mail
Реклама
Соответствующий теме материал
  • Похожее
  • Популярное
  • Облако тегов
  • Здесь
  • Временно
  • Пусто
Теги