рефераты конспекты курсовые дипломные лекции шпоры

Реферат Курсовая Конспект

THE SIMPLE SENTENCE PARTS OF THE SENTENCE

THE SIMPLE SENTENCE PARTS OF THE SENTENCE - раздел Иностранные языки, Some General Remarks § 420. Traditionally The Subject And The Predicate Are Re­garded As The Prima...

§ 420. Traditionally the subject and the predicate are re­garded as the primary or principal parts of the sentence and the attribute, the object and the adverbial modifier — as the secondary parts of the sentence. This opposition primary —

 


secondary is justified by the difference in function. While the subject and the predicate make the predication and thus constitute th*e sentence, the secondary parts serve to expand it by being added to the words of the predication in accordance with their combinability as words. Thus the sentence combines syntactical and morphological relations, which, in our opinion, it is necessary to discriminate more rigorously than it is usually done.

§ 421. The traditional classification of the parts of the sentence is open to criticism from the point of view of consist­ency.

The name attribute really shows the subordinate nature of the part of the sentence it denotes. The double term adverbial modifier shows not only the secondary character of the cor­responding part of the sentence (modifier), but also refers to a certain part of speech (adverbial). The term object does not indicate subordination, it only refers to the contert.

Many words of a sentence, such as prepositions, conjunc­tions, articles, particles, parenthetical words, are traditional!} not considered as parts of the sentence, even as tertiary ores But as we know (§§ 3, 396, 400), the parts of a unit are units of the next lower level, in our case words. The function of each word in the sentence is its relation to the other words and to the sentence as a whole. So each word is as much a part of the sentence as each morpheme "is a part of the word (its root, prefix, inflexion, etc.)

The infinitive to find in the sentence Your task is to find it is regarded as a part of the predicate and is named pre­dicative. The same infinitive in the sentence Jane is to find it is also considered as a part of the predicate, but it is not called 'predicative'. It has no name at all, as well as the infinitives in We ought to find it., We cannot find it, etc.

When a noun or an adjective is attached to a finite link-verb it is called a 'predicative' (He is a teacher), but when it is attached to a verbid link-verb (To be a teacher is my dream),, it has no name. With objects it is different. The noun letter is an object both in He writes a I e t t e r and in He wants to write a I e 11 e r.

Many of these inconsistencies can be done away with if we discriminate -between the syntactical and the morpholo­gical relations within the sentence.


§ 422. In this book, as already noted (§ 393), only the words containing the structural meanings of predicativity are re­garded as the structural subject and predicate. The chief criterion for the division of all the other words of a sentence into parts of the.sentence is their combinability. Thus com-binability is the property that correlates parts of speech and parts of the sentence as well as the functions of notional and semi-notional words.

Those notional words in a sentence which are adjuncts of certain head-words will be divided in accordance with their head-words (see § 420) into attributes, complements and extensions.

Those semi-notional words which serve to connect two words or clauses (prepositions, conjunctions) will be regarded as a separate part of the sentence, connectives.

Those semi-notional words that are used to specify various words or word combinations (articles, particles) will be called specifiers.

Finally, words in a sentence, with zero connections, referring to the sentence and known as parenthetical ele­ments, are a distinct part of the sentence.

PRIMARY PARTS The Subject

§ 423. The subject is the independent member of a two-member predication, containing the person component of pred-icativity. Both members of the predication he sleeps contain the meaning of 'person'. But in sleeps this meaning depends on that of he and is due to grammatical combinability. This accounts for the fact that sleeps cannot make a sentence alone, though it contains all the components of predicativity. Sleeps likewise depends on lie as far as the meaning of 'numbej' is concerned. The meanings of 'person' and 'number' in are kxico-grammatical (see § 148) and independent.

§ 424. The subject is generally defined as a word or a group of words denoting the thing we speak about *. This traditional definition is logical rather than grammatical. In the sentence This pretty girl is my sister's friend the defi-

N 1 See, for instance, M. Ganshina and N. Vasilevskaya, op. cit., p. 271


 

 


nition can be applied to the whole group This pretty girl, to say nothing of the fact that "the thing we speak about" is so vague that it practically covers any part of the sentence expressing substantivity.

§ 425. The subject of a simple sentence can be a word, a syntactical word-morpheme or a complex.

As a word it can belong to different parts of speech, buf it is mostly a noun or a pro-noun.

E.g. Fame is the thirst of youth. (Byron).

Nothing endures but personal qualities. (Whit­man). To see is to believe.

A word used as a subject combines the lexical meaning with the structural meaning of 'person'. So it is at the same time the structural and the notional subject.

The syntactical word-morphemes there and it (see § 391) are only structural subjects because as word-morphemes they have no lexical meaning. But they are usually correlated with some words or complexes in the sentence which are regarded as notional subjects. In such-cases it and there are also called anticipatory or introductory subjects.

In There is somebody in the room the notional subject is somebody. In It requires no small talents to be a bore (Scott) the notional subject is to be a bore. In It is raining there is no notional subject and it is not anticipatory. In It 'is neces­sary for him to come the notional subject is the com­plex for him to come. But a complex may also be used as the only subject.

E. g. For him to come would be fatal.

§ 426. We may speak of a secondary subject within a com­plex. In the following sentence it is the noun head.

Several thousand people went to see the headless statue yesterday before it was removed for a new head to be cast from the original plaster moulds. (Daily Worker).

The syntactical word-morphemes there and it may also function as secondary subjects. ~

/ / being cold, we put on our coats. I knew of there being no one to help him.


§ 427. The analysis of sentences like He was seen to enter the house, is a point at issue. Traditionally the infyiitive is said to form part of the 'complex subject' (He ...to enter).. B. A. Ilyish l maintains that though satisfactory from the logical point of view, this interpretation seems to be artifi­cial grammatically, this splitting of the subject being alien to English. Accordingly B. A. Ilyish suggests that only he should be treated as the subject of the sentence, whereas was seen to ent&r represents a peculiar type of compound predicate.

The traditional analysis, however, seems preferable, for it admits of treating the sentence as a passive transform of They saw him enter the house with the 'complex object' him enter becoming a 'complex subject' he... to enter. As to the splitting of the subject, it is another device to bring the structural parts of the subject and predicate together (he was), which is so typical of English.

§ 428. Some authors as, for example, A. Smirnitsky 2 M. Ganshina and N. Vasilevskaya 3 speak of definite-personal, indefinite-personal and impersonal sentences in Modern Eng­lish. We see no syntactical ground whatever for this classifi* cation since definite-personal, indefinite-personal, etc. sen­tences have no structural peculiarities typical of these class­es. It is a semantical classification of subjects, not sentences.

§ 429.. If we compare the subject in English with that of Russian we shall find a considerable difference between them.

1. In Modern Russian the subject is as a rule characterized
by a distinct morphological feature — the nominative case,
whereas in English it is for the most part (unless it is expressed
by a personal pronoun or the pronoun who in the nominative
case) indicated by the position it occupies in the sentence.

2. In Modern Russian the subject is much less obligatory
as a part of the sentence than in English. One-member sen­
tences are numerous and of various types, among them sen­
tences like Приду. Пишет. In English a finite verb (barring
the 'imperative mood' finites) does not, as a rule, make a
sentence without a subject.

1 Op. cit., p 56—57

2 Синтаксис английского языка, p Й2.
3Op. cit., p. 273.


i.


3. In English the subject may be a syntactical word-morphenje, a gerund or a complex, which is, naturally, alien to Russian.

– Конец работы –

Эта тема принадлежит разделу:

Some General Remarks

От авторов... Some General Remarks... Morphology...

Если Вам нужно дополнительный материал на эту тему, или Вы не нашли то, что искали, рекомендуем воспользоваться поиском по нашей базе работ: THE SIMPLE SENTENCE PARTS OF THE SENTENCE

Что будем делать с полученным материалом:

Если этот материал оказался полезным ля Вас, Вы можете сохранить его на свою страничку в социальных сетях:

Все темы данного раздела:

SOME GENERAL REMARKS
§ 1. In this book the phoneme, the morpheme, the word,and the sentenceare regarded as the basic units of language and speech. The definitions of these units have n

INTRODUCTION
§ 6. There exist many definitions of the. term word and none of them is generally accepted. But in the majority of cases pedple actually experience no difficulty in separating one word from

THE STRUCTURE OF WORDS
§ 7. One of the main properties of a word is its double nature. It is material because it can he heard or seen, and it is immaterial or ideal as far as its meaning is concerned. We shall regard the

THE CLASSIFICATION OF WORDS
§ 19. A morpheme usually has more than one meaning. This is the case, for instance, with both the lexical and the grammatical morpheme in the word runs. The morpheme run- has the following m

THE NOUN
§ 64. As follows from our previous discussion of the parts of speech in English, the noun may be defined as a part of speech characterized by the following features: 1. The lexico-grammati

The Category of Number
§ 71. The category of number of Engl ish nouns is the system of opposemes (such as girl — girls, foot — feet, etc.) showing whether the noun stands for оде object or more than

Noun Grammemes in Speech
§ 87. An English noun lexeme may contain four words at most (boy, boys, boy's, boys'). Each of these words, as we know (§ 19), represents not only the lexeme, but a certain grammeme as well.

THE ADJECTIVE
§ 101. Adjectives are a part of speech characterized by the following typical features: 1. The lexico-grammatical meaning of 'attributes (of substances)'. It should be understood that

Adjective Grammemes in Speech
§ 110. An English adjective lexeme may contain three words at most (strong — stronger — strongest) representing three grammemes. The fourth grammeme contains words with the oblique me

THE ADVERB
§ 116. The adverb is a part of speech characterized by the following features: * 1. The lexico-grammatical meaning of "qualitative, quan­ titative or circumstantial characteri

THE NUMERAL
§ 130. The numeral as a part of speech is characterized by 1) its lexico-grammatical meaning of 'number', 2) the category of numerical qualification represented in opposemes l

PRONOUNS
, § 139. It has been shown above that words fall into classes known as parts of speech in accordance with their lexico-grammatical meanings, morphological categories, typi­cal stem-building element

Хаймович и др
      But what is more important, pronouns can be substituted «not only for nouns, but for othe

Generalizing Pronouns
§ 178. Here belong such pronouns as all, both, each, either, every and its compounds (everyone, everybody, every­thing, everywhere) which give a generalizing indication of persons, th

THE VERB
§ 187. Analysing the verb in Modern Russian, V. V. Vi-nogradov characterizes it as "the most complex and capacious part of speech" J. Likewise, A. I. Smirnitsky 2 st

The Category of Voice
§ 203. The category of voice is the system of two-member opposemes (loves — is loved, loving — being loved, to love — to be loved, has loved — has, been loved, et

The Category of Aspect
§ 218. The category of aspect is a system of two-member opposemes such as works — is working, has worked — has been working, to work — to be working showing the characte

The Indicative Mood
§ 229. The indicative mood is the basic mood of the verb. Morphologically it is the most developed system including all the categories of the verb. Semantically it is a fact mood. It serve

The Subjunctive Mood
§ 239. Probably the only thing linguists are unanimous about with regard to the subjunctive mood is that it repre­sents an action as a 'non-fact', as something imaginary, 1

The Imperative Mood
§ 247. The imperative mood represents an action as a com­mand, urging, request, exhortation addressed to one's inter­locutor^). It is a direct expression of one's will. Therefore it is much more 's

Verb Grammemes in Speech
§ 251. When used in speech a word has but one of its lexical meanings and all of its grammatical meanings (see § 21). Thus in the sentence He writes to me every week, the verb writes

Indicative Mood Grammemes
The Present, Non-Continuous, Non-Perfect § 253. As a part of the verb system it may be said to pre­sent an action in the present (present tense) unspecified as to its character (non-contin

Voice Grammemes
§ 288. In the' system of the English language the active (non-marked) and the passive (marked) members of the voice opposeme are equal in rank, mutually complementing each other. This is not the ca

Subjunctive Mood Grammemes in Speech
§ 293. As we know, there is not a single subjunctive mood grammeme which has no homonyms in the indicative or in the imperative mood (or both). The discrimination of homo-nymous grammemes rests on

Imperative Mood Grammemes in Speech
§ 302. In most cases they serve to present an order, com­mand, exhortation, request, etc. as a direct expression of the speaker's will. In certain surroundings, however, mostly in

The Gerund
§ 321. The gerund is a verbid characterized by the follow­ing features: 1. Its dual lexico-grammatical meaning of an action partially viewed as a substance. 2. The categories

THE RESPONSE WORDS
§ 334. The response-words yes and no are characterized as a separate class by a) their meaning of 'response statement', b) their negative combinability, c)

THE INTERJECTION
§ 337. The interjection is a part of speech characterized by the following features. 1. It expresses "emotions or will without naming them. 2. It has no grammatical categorie

THE PREPOSITION
§ 342. The preposition is a part of speech characterized by the following features: Kits lexico-grammatical meaning of 'relations (of sub­stances)'. 2. Its bilateral combinability

THE CONJUNCTION
§ 353. The conjunction is a part of speech characterized by the following features. 1. Its lexico-grammatical meaning of 'relations between substances, actions, properties, situations,

THE ARTICLE
§ 364. The two words a(n), the form a separate group or class characterized by a) the lexico-grammatical meaning of '(in)definiteness', •b) the right-hand combinability with nouns,

THE PARTICLE
§ 372. The particle as a part of speech is characterized by the following features: 1. Its lexico-grammatical meaning of 'emphatic specifi­ cation'. 2. Its unilateral combina,

INTRODUCTION
§ 378. The basic unit of syntax is the sentence.There exist many definitions of the sentence, but none of them is generally accepted 1. But in the majority of cas

L/j8 Хаймсшич и
tences when the predicate verb contains no morphological word-morphemes. § 392. A unit of a higher level, as we know, contains units of the next lower level. A sentence contai

THE STRUCTURE OF A SENTENCE
§ 396. As defined (§ 3), when studying the structure of a unit, we find out its components, mostly units of the next lower level, their arrangement and their functions as parts of the unit.

A. As to Their Structure
§ 403. Sentences with only one predication are called simple sentences. Those with more than one predication have usually no general name 3. We shall call them

Combinations of Sentences
§ 416. The sentence is usually the limit of grammatical analysis. Conrbinations of sentences have never got adequate attention on the part of linguists. Yet the necessity of extending linguistic an

The Predicate
§ 430. The predicate is the member of a predication con­ taining the mood and tense (or only mood) components of predicativity. " E. g. This dictionary employs a pronunciat

G) Adverbials of attending circumstances
He sank down in his chair, resting his chin in his hand. (Dreiser). - §456. Qualitative and quantitative adverbial complements are more closely connected with their headword

Attributes
§ 459. Attributes are secondary parts of the sentence serv­ing to modify nouns or noun-equivalents in whatever func­tions they are used in the sentence. In simple sentences attributes can

Extensions
§ 467. Extensions are adjuncts of adjectives, adverbs and adlinks in a sentence. They differ from complements and attributes in being usually modifiers of modifiers, or ter-tiaries,

Connectives
§ 469. Connectives are linking-words considered as a second­ary part of the sentence. They are mostly prepositions and conjunctions. She played and sang to him. (London). C

Го-Specifiers
§ 471. The peculiar combinability and functions of particles distinguish them from all other words in the sentence. They .-are not adjuncts of definite parts of speech like complements, .attributes

Parenthetical Elements
§ 473. Parenthetical elements are peculiar parts of the sentence. a) They are characterized by negative combinability with the other words of the sentence. b) They are, as it

WORD-ORDER IN SIMPLE SENTENCES 1. The Position of the Subject and the Predicate in the Sentence
§ 477. We have already dwelt upon the fact that in Modern "English syntactical relations of words in the sentence are very often indicated by the position the words occupy in the sen­tence.

II. The Position of the Object
a) The Place of the Direct Object § 479. The direct object is usually placed after the verb unless the indirect object precedes it. He offered me his help. However

THE COMPOSITE SENTENCE
§ 492. Composite sentences, as we know (§ 403), divide into compound and complex sentences. The difference between them is not only in the relations of coordination or subordina­tion, as usually st

THE COMPOUND SENTENCE
§ 496. The clauses of compound sentences are of equal rank, but usually the clause preceding the conjunction is regarded as the initial clause to which the other clause is related. These relations

THE COMPLEX SENTENCE
§ 498. The principal clauses of complex sentences are usually not classified, though their meanings are not neutral with regard to the meanings of the subordinate clauses. Cf. He will c

Complement Clauses
a) Predicative Clauses § 509. The sentence The question is where he can be found consists of the principal clause the question is and the predi­cative clause where he can

Attribute Clauses
§ 518. Attributive clauses are postpositive adjuncts of nouns. They are commonly divided into relative and a'pposi-tiveclauses. Relative clauses are introduced by pronouns (or asyn

Extension Clauses
§ 520. Extension clauses are postpositive adjuncts of adjec­tives, adverbs and adlinks. E. g. It is indeed doubtful how he had become aware that Ro

Parenthetical Clauses
§ 521. Most authors who do not regard parenthetical ele­ments as parts of the sentence treat It is past ten, I think as a simple sentence 1. We do not find this view convin

COMPOUND-COMPLEX AND COMPLEX-COMPOUND SENTENCES
§ 523. Sometimes subordination and coordination may be combined within one sentence, in which case we may have compound-complex and complex-compound sentences. 1 See M. Ganshma,

DIRECT AND INDIRECT SPEECH
§ 524. Among the composite sentences of English and other languages we find a peculiar type differing from the rest. Cf. He said, "/ love you". (Greene). ,

CONCLUSION
§ 530. We have made a survey of the morphological and syntactical systems of Modern English, resorting, where ap­propriate, to comparison with Modern Russian. Now, by way of summing up, we shall ma

Теоретическая грамматика английского языка
(на английском языке) Редактор Л. И, Кравцова Издательский редактор Л. А. Долгопятова Технический редактор Т. Л. Гарина Корректоры Л. Т. Тихонова и

Хотите получать на электронную почту самые свежие новости?
Education Insider Sample
Подпишитесь на Нашу рассылку
Наша политика приватности обеспечивает 100% безопасность и анонимность Ваших E-Mail
Реклама
Соответствующий теме материал
  • Похожее
  • Популярное
  • Облако тегов
  • Здесь
  • Временно
  • Пусто
Теги